Tesla Sued In Australia For Overpromising Range, Phantom Braking, Misleading FSD

Tesla continued in Australia for a range of overpromises, a ghost braking, a tricke FSD


The collective appeal says that Tesla has not solved the problems or offers compensation to the owners

                                                                            

<!––>

by Brad Anderson

1 hour ago

<!––>

    Tesla continued in Australia for a range of overpromises, a ghost braking, a tricke FSD

<!–

–>

  • The law firm says that many model owners and models cannot reach 75% of the range cited.
  • This collective appeal is open to anyone with a model 3 or a model has been built there since May 2021.
  • A German court recently described Tesla’s automatic system as “defective” on ghost braking.

Tesla is no stranger to legal problems and is now the subject of another trial, although this time, he comes from Down Under. According to a new trial before the Federal Court of Australia, Tesla Motors Australia overestimated the driving beaches of its electric vehicles, overvalued on autonomous characteristics and has vehicles with a ghost braking case.

The latter has been teslas for some time and has been the subject of other prosecution, including in Germany. Last week, a German court judged that Tesla’s automatic pilot system was “defective” and not “adapted to normal use” due to ghost braking problems.

Read: The court governs the defective Tesla automatic pilot for normal use after ghost braking

In this case, the Australian law firm JGA Saddler describes ghost braking as a “dangerous phenomenon (this) would terrify you and your passengers and could, if it causes an accident, cause serious injuries and / or death.”

In addition, JGA Saddler director Rebecca Jancauskas challenged Tesla selling her full driving features promised for a long time without keeping the promises she made for the system. She also claims that many Tesla vehicles sold in Australia cannot reach 75% of their announced practice, and estimates that the automaker has known its faults for years, but has so far not solved the problems or pay a compensation to owners.



    Tesla continued in Australia for a range of overpromises, a ghost braking, a tricke FSD

“We hope that this statement highlights the importance for all electric vehicle manufacturers to be truthful in their marketing, keep their promises and ensure that their products are safe and reliable,” Jancauskas told Yahoo! News.

The collective appeal is open to anyone who has bought or rented a 3 model or a Y Tesla model with the controversial tesla vision system since May 2021.

“Tesla has made promises of security, performance and features of their vehicles such as their” autonomous complete “, but it seems that some of these promises fall flat,” added Jancauskas. We do not know how many owners and tenants have registered to be part of the collective appeal.



    Tesla continued in Australia for a range of overpromises, a ghost braking, a tricke FSD

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *