Cincinnati police changed his story, admitting that an officer caused the accident and that Haven did not repair the damaged car
–>
- An officer would have struck a motorist after lighting a red light and admitted that they were at fault.
- After nine months trying to resolve damage to its car, the department has changed its air.
- Now, the Cincinnati motorist is talking about the situation hoping that things will change.
It is not only criminals that can destroy your goods – sometimes the police do it too. A man in Cincinnati learned that hard, saying that not only did the police damaged his car when they did not even respond to an emergency, but after admitting the fault, they changed their history and refused responsibility. And after nine months of back and forth while trying to obtain a resolution, the ministry decided to wash your hands.
Read: 3 drivers from Maryland have accumulated more than 330 tickets but continue to drive
Agents often have immunity to damage personal property if they are in the midst of their functions. This means that citizens are responsible for repairing everything that cops damage. Sometimes the officers admit their errors and assume responsibilities, which would be what happened to this case.
An erroneous turn causes damage
David Emery spoke to Wcpo About the incident, explaining that, while turning into a street, a cincinnati police officer directed a stop panel and almost hit him. The officer, who did not use his emergency lights, initially missed Emery, but then, for unknown reasons, he put the police car upside down and still hit him. The accident report confirmed that the officer was at fault and clearly indicated that he did not respond to any emergency.
Although the officer was at fault, it took Emery nine months and countless telephone calls just to obtain an answer on his complaint. When he finally heard that the state had conveniently changed his air. They have now said that the officer answered a call and, therefore, they were not responsible for the damage.
The authorities insist that everything is above the board of directors with regard to the law. According to WCPO, “A letter sent to Emery said that the officer answered a call to service. He also said that the ministry is “sensitive” to its loss, but under the revised Ohio code, they are not required to repair damage. “It’s true, since NOW the officer was Responding to a call to service, everything is completely good!
What about those who cannot afford to solve this problem?
Even so, Emery says that he is not even angry with the CPD – he is just worried about the way it all happened. “I am very lucky and happy to be able to manage it financially, but I am sure there are some people who could not,” he said.
And that’s the real problem here. Not everyone has the financial cushion to manage a situation like this, and when the department changes its blame or simply ignores its responsibilities, it is the average citizen who ends up breaking through the bill.
