Earlier this month, Tesla with FSD in China was filmed by committing at least 7 driving violations
<!–
–>
by Brad Anderson
March 25, 2025 at 07:49
–>
–>
- Car manufacturers must now subject details on OTA software updates to local authorities.
- Xpeng was also forced to delay the introduction of an update of the Mona M03 EV.
- Tesla initially introduced the system with a free trial, encouraging the owners to pay the system.
Only a few weeks after Tesla launched her full -fledged driving package (supervised) in China, it was revealed that the program was temporarily interrupted. This is bad news for the American car manufacturer because it faces growing competition from Chinese brands not only with regard to the performance of electric vehicles, but also with autonomous systems.
The system was introduced locally thanks to a free one month trial, hoping to encourage Tesla owners to pay the system thanks to a live software update. However, a new set of rules of the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technologies means that car manufacturers must submit detailed technical information to the authorities before launching live software updates of cars belonging to customers.
Read: Tesla FSD Test Drive in China ends with 7 fines in one night
Discussing the news on Weibo, Tesla’s vice-president of business in China, Grace Tao, said that once all the requirements met, the update “will be pushed to everyone as soon as possible.”
Carnewschina Reports according to which this same new regulation forced Xpeng to delay a live update that she had planned for the Mona M03 EV.
The introduction of full -fledged driving in China was not without its problems in China. Earlier this month, and shortly after the introduction of the system, the driver of a model accumulated no less than 7 driving fines in a single night due to the violations made by the FSD system. During this test, carried out by a local car blogger, the car has repeatedly confused bike bikes as a return to right. He also made illegal changes, crossing the full lines.
A separate test also compared the Tesla system with the driver’s driver assistance systems and Aito. During the test, the Tesla accumulated 34 driving violations and required 24 driver’s interventions, while the L7 Li car had 9 interventions and 14 violations. The Aito M9 also carried out Tesla FSD, recording 12 interventions and 14 violations.
